- So what makes a good woodcarving knife and what should you look for when buying one?
- It should be made of a good quality steel, reasonably hard and take a good edge, most knives on the market you can take this one as read.
- It should be quite narrow from top to bottom in order to allow cuts in concave areas, anything over 15mm gets in the way, this is where most general purpose knives fail to make good carvers.
- It should not have any sort of hilt or blade guard, these get in the way and are not needed for carving. They are only needed to stop the hand sliding onto the blade if using a stabbing type cut which we never do in woodcarving.
- A relatively long thin blade without too much "belly" works much better for most cuts, the belly is that rounded bit of the edge toward the point on the general purpose knife pictured below, great for skinning bad for woodcarving.
- Beginners tend to favour short blades feeling they are safer but this does limit the cuts you can do, particularly long effective slicing cuts to create large flat planes are easier with a longer blade.
- The woodcarving knife should have what is called a "scandi" grind, that is the edge should be effectively a triangle coming down to a perfect point. Many general purpose knives have what is called a secondary bevel and this is not so good for controlled woodcarving. This is a general purpose "mora" knife and the secondary bevel which forms the edge is seen as a line of light.
A close up shows the big primary bevel created by rough grinding and the small secondary bevel forming the edge.
The woodcarving knife should look like this with no secondary bevel.
Now the reason you don't want a secondary bevel is because we use the flat primary bevel to control the cut in carving work. It makes no difference when using a knife to cut leather or vegetable where the knife is at right angles to the work but for carving we lay the bevel flat on the wood and slide it along, a secondary bevel lifts the edge away from the wood as shown in this picture from Wille Sundqvists book, "Swedish carving techniques"
Now the shape of the knife and actually which knife should you buy?
My personal favourites and the tools I use on all my carving courses are made by Frosts in the town of Mora in Sweden. Industrial mechanised production allows them to make good quality knives at incredibly competitive prices. They make two nice birch handled woodcarving (or "sloyd") knives the models 106 and 120. The longer model 106 is the best general woodcarving knife I have used and costs little over £10. The shorter 120 is popular and good though not quite as good for concave cuts because it lacks the thin tip area and long slicing cuts because you need the length for those.
Both these knives have laminated blades that is the steel is a sandwich of very hard high carbon in the middle with softer steel at the sides. This was traditionally done with quality knives to allow the central core to be harder (and hold the edge longer) whilst not becoming too brittle because it was supported by the softer steel at the sides. It also makes sharpening easier since most of the metal removed during sharpening is the softer steel at the side, this is easier to cut and gives more feedback that hardened steel.
These are not the only knives suitable for carving. I am a fan of Del Stubbs knives, particularly his regular sloyd and for readers in the US I would recommend them highly.
Pocket folding knives called "whittlers" are OK for peeling the bark off a twig or pointing a skewer for the BBQ but not for serious woodcarving.
The last thing to know about woodcarving knives is that a good tool will not make up for poor technique. When you see someone working effectively with a knife it is 80% down to technique, 20% to the tool.
This is me carving with a knife.
Here is master woodcarver Wille Sundqvist teaching our children safe carving technique, quite a few years ago.





17 comments:
Inereting , but to each teir own. I've a few friends who carve well using pocket knives, a Ross Oar is a favorite. As for my weapon of chioce its changing slowly towarss using chisels. Regardless of choice if it lacks that scary sharp edge its no good to me.
I'm a fan of Refsal and his knives but if the carving is small then I find them cumbersome.
Thanks for an interesting opinion.
rgds
John
Thanks this is a nice article. I just read this one and reread your post on waterstones from awhile back. judging from the picture on the one and the waterstone post. You don't hollow grind your carving knives. Is that right? Guess it doesn't really matter. Just wondering.
Also I think your right about liking narrow knives. For the most I starting to agree with you. But I also have a Svante that is almost 7/8" by 4". I like using it for roughing cut and soothing the back of the bowl of the spoon. I like to use the convex edge to smooth the wide surface. I liken it to a plane iron having an cambered edge. Anyway thought I would throw that out there. Your right though because for the most part. I do about half to two-third of a spoon with either my Del Stubbs regular sloyd, and an a narrow Mora knife (one that because narrowed by sharpening more narrow than the 120).
Thanks for the comments. DIY.Pocket knives can be used for carving but they all have a secondary bevel which means you do not get the effect of being able to control the cut by running the big primary bevel on the wood. Refsal knives are great for what they are designed for flat plane carving in soft woods. I love the work of Axel Peterson but most flat plane carving done today I find a bit twee.
Tim,
No I don't hollow grind, I have a Tormek so I easily could. I sharpen Japanese style a single flat bevel on waterstones. I occasionally use a larger knife for roughing out and asked Del to make the large sloyd which is now part of his range. In practice though I find I seem to end up using a 106 all the time. There is no right answer, it's a question of what works for you and for me as often as not it is just the closest knife I lay my hands on and I have lots of 106's.
Okay well the reason I ask. Is that have try on and off over the past 7 or so years hollowing grinding knifes. The idea is to save time. But so far most of the time it doesn't. I often don't get a very good grind. Which takes more time to remove. And I often end up with a nearly flat grind anyways.
So I guess I'm wondering is this same reason you do not hollow grind your knives.
I guess so, when anyone sharpens they want a good edge for the work they do in as short a time as possible. I am always experimenting with sharpening but currently I am liking using only waterstones.
I can hollow grind on the tormek but I don't so much like using jigs and the wheel is too small to grind well freehand. I have recently bought an old wet waterstone grinder 2 foot in diameter which is easier to freehand grind on but won't leave much of a hollow on a small knife.
I think most professional knife makers now are using belts and if they want hollow they us a contact wheel. This followed by a quick touch on the buffing wheel gives a good edge in very little time.
That's for sure. I think some people think I like sharpening as much time and thought I give it. But I really just want to have the best edge I can for my work. The faster I can get back to work the better.
Okay. I don't like the jig either. But so far that given me the most consist grind. But you can even use the jig on narrow knifes.
Sounds like I should maybe look into either an larger wet grinder or belt grinder.
Also on another topic from reading all your stuff on hook knives. You don't have to spend much for an good sloyd knife. But for a good hook knife your going have to spend alittle more. My favorites right now are Hans Karlsson's (wish I could try those by Bo Helgesson). But what I'm not clear on is which frost hook knife you recommend to students that don't have much money to spend, but are willing to spend time sharpening and modifying them. The single bevel or double bevel (dulling one bevel of couse)
I recommend the 164 tight curve single edge. It is not ideal but it works. I like the Karlsson too.
Alright Thanks for all your help!
Hei, man. Use russian knife from Vorsma (little town on Obi-river). I'm too many time use some knifes, and norvegian too, and can say - there is nothing better than Russian steel. Seek "Saro-Vorsma". I'm use now knife named as "Lisa-2" (Eng: "Fox-2").
Be fun!
Robin, I think I understand your reasoning for favoring the longer Frosts knife.I prefer the 2-1/4" Frost's carver and the 2-3/4" Frost's sloyd knife to remove wood. For finer cravings I have many other smaller (under 2") knives to choose from for a specific purposes.
The longer Frost's knife you prefer tends to not provide the power needed for larger cuts when using the end of the blade. It's a simple matter of physics.You have less leverage further out the blade, particularly with a narrow light point. I do use a 3-1/2" X 3/4" WWII Finnish Puuko and a Skookum Bush Tool 3-3/4" X 1" x 1/8" thick for processing wood. My newest is a Roselli UHC with a very short blade. I'm always searching for the "magical knife" and the small Frost's carver is my favorite for much of my carving. I my try the sloyd knives from Country Workshops (Drew Langsner) and Dell Stubbs.
Hi Lewis, if a short blade works for you that is fine. The reason I like the longer blade is that it allows more slicing action. I use the whole of the 3 1/2" edge to cut through 1" of wood. For power cuts I am working by the handle not at the tip. Wille and Jogge Sunqvist are fans of the 106 too though many folk do get on well with the shorter 120. I don't get as uptight as some chasing the perfect knife so long as the basics are there then technique is far more important than the knife. Many beginners feel if they had a better or more expensive knife then maybe everything would be easier. I have a very large collection of hand made and factory made knives I have forged many myself and worked with good knifemakers to design good carving knives and the Frosts 106 works as well as any of them.
Great article, I use the Mora Knives as well and love them.
I have also found a skilled craftsman located across the border from me here in Canada that makes his own knvies. I absolutely love them. It usually takes awhile (last order was 2mos) to receive my sloyd, but well worth the wait. Anyone else use Pinewood Forge knives? http://www.pinewoodforge.com/
Loved your article on spoonfest! hope i can attend one day!
yep Pinewood forge is Dell Stubbs referred to in the article, great knives. He sadly had a bad accident since I wrote the article damaging his hand and has a backlog of orders but he is back in production now.
hi, came across ur video looking at carving info. im a beginner and trying to choose a knife. im trying to find somthing i can use for fire wood processing as well as carving/whittling. i have my eyes on the Mora Force or the Mora Forest (2010) are those good or bad choices? the force is 2mm thick all the way thru the whole blade and is scandi, and the forest is 2mm scandi the first half, near the handle, and thinner at the tip with i think a flat or convex grind. any help appriciated, thanks.
@Chris once you have finished your firewood processing your woodcarving knife will not be in the best shape and more than if you did firewood processing with a chefs knife then tried to cut tomatoes. A good woodcarving knife will do a few feather sticks and so on but I think better to buy a 106 and a cheap general purpose knife, the ones you mention are good general purpose knives but there are cheaper ones too eg http://www.clasohlson.com/uk/Morakniv-%C2%AE-Craftline-Q-511-Knife/Pr407804000
lets say the mora force was kept sharp, is the blade on that model too thick and wide to be usefull as a primary general shaper in wood carving paired with a another knife(knives) more suited for wood crafting for the detail work? it is 2.4mm thick and 23.5mm wide and scandi. thank you.
Thanks for the tips!
Best regards,
Maarten
http://blog.mjvanderwielen.com
Post a Comment